The unique properties of S-center of the Universe

When, at the very beginning of this research, back in the 1970s, I discovered that at the S-Center of the Universe (SCU) there is a living cell, I was overcome with the thrill of communicating the deepest mystery of the Universe. And it was this fact that awakened in me an unquenchable desire to understand what is represented by a large-scale space, the center of which is so precisely occupied by life.

Doubts constantly hovered over me, sometimes encompassing me completely, and then the scale boundaries seemed shaky, their definition seemed arbitrary, the S-axis itself became no more than a conditional parameter.

The only way I could banish my doubts was to collect another layer of information, systematize it along the scale axis and determine its structure-forming role. This is how the STATICS of the SCALE RANGE was first manifested, then the STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY OF THE THREE FLOORS OF THE UNIVERSE was revealed, the meaning of the DYNAMIC PERIODICITY OF SYNTHESIS-DELIVISION became clearer....

After each step, my doubts left me for a while, but then reappeared. It was too much information to be sure of the accuracy and volume of the information.

The work of systematization was sometimes exhausting. But the fatigue receded when I saw that no one but me still knew about the central scale position of life in the Universe, and when I saw that this ignorance led to an appalling worldview of despondency and cynicism. Then I went back to the reference books and special literature and got another slice of the S-World order, which convinced me myself that the S-Center of the Universe is not an empty formality, but an essential aspect of our world.

Of course, our whole world, with its galaxies and atoms, may be just a part of a much bigger world, where other laws exist, where another mind is doing the hard work of understanding, but does that make the universe in which we live not the whole world less important?

Whether the scaling boundaries we have used in this paper are absolute or relative, whether the fundamental length and radius of the Universe limit the world to humans only or to all intelligent beings in the Universe — these are philosophical questions of a very general nature.

Man cannot break out of his own shell, abandon his Earth and become an alien. We are creating a science of humans, not ephemeral inhabitants of other worlds. And for our science, the identified boundaries will forever remain as important as the boundaries of the planet Earth established centuries ago.

And so, comprehending the laws of scale space in order to establish the real significance of the scale-central position of life, I gradually discovered such facts that were not connected with boundary conditions and even with scale symmetry.

I discovered facts that simply showed the highlighted position of the Scale Center of the Universe (SCU) in the hierarchy of processes and phenomena of the Universe. So the SCU began to work in a feedback loop. Its isolation reinforced the reality of the large-scale boundaries of our world.

And it became clear that the size of about 50 microns is itself a fundamental parameter of our world, which is as accurate as the radius of the Universe.

Simple calculations show that at a diameter of the Universe of \(1.6 \cdot 10^{28}\) cm the SCU is located at 50 µm, at a diameter of the Universe of \(10^{28}\) cm at 40 µm, at a diameter of \(2.5 \cdot 10^{28}\) cm at 63 µm, at a diameter of \(10^{28.8}\) cm at 100 µm.

We see that the entire range of the theoretically calculated age of the Universe from 10 to 25 billion years gives very non-significant variations in the position of the MCV between 40 and 100 μm.

Let's look again at what is remarkable about the S-Center of the Universe.

At the same time, it is necessary to realize that in nature regularities often make their way through statistical diversity. Therefore, it is pointless to analyze objects with a size of only 50 μm and not to consider objects with a size of 40 or 60 μm. To begin with, it is quite enough to choose a range of only one order of magnitude: from \(10^{-3}\) cm to \(10^{-2}\) cm (or from 10 to 100 μm), which is 1/61 of the entire S-interval of the Universe, or about 1.5% of its length. Consequently, considering a "fat" point on the S-axis in one order of magnitude, from 10 to 100 µm, we get deviations not more than 1.5 %, which for the first theoretical approximation is more than accurate.

For the sake of brevity, we will hereafter refer to the size of 50 µm as the SCU and the range from 10 to 100 µm as the SCU range.

Let us enumerate the many remarkable features of the mass center of the Universe, dividing them into those belonging exclusively to biology and to physics.

BIOLOGICAL ASPECT

First. It is the SCU range that is the average size for all kinds of cells: unicellular, plant and animal.

Second. It is in this size range that cells acquire the ultimate form of symmetry — radial-spherical.

Third. It's practically only in the range of SCU that the mystery of the transformation of non-living matter and energy into living matter, since both diatom algae, autotrophic bacteria, and chloro-plastes of plants have sizes mostly from this range.

Fourth. The reproduction of unicellular organisms proceeds by the process of division. And this process mainly occurs when organisms reach the size of the HAB range.

Five. Reproduction of multicellular organisms occurs by the synthesis of two sex cells.

Most spermatozoa and female germ cell nuclei are in the size range of the SCU range.

Sixth. The size of the nucleus of a female germ cell and a human sperm-tozoon at the moment of their synthesis corresponds almost perfectly to the size of the SCU.

Thus, the isolation of the SCU range in the scale hierarchy for protein systems is obvious. The following fundamental conclusion can be drawn from it.

LIFE IS NOT ONLY CONCENTRATED IN ITS BASIC — CELLULAR FORM IN THE S-CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE, BUT ALSO APPEARED AND CONTINUES TO REPRODUCE IN THIS VERY LARGE-SCALE SLICE.

Let us indulge in some philosophical reflections on this topic.

We can see that not only all multicellular beings originate in the SCU, but also the act of reproduction for all unicellular organisms takes place in the same size range. Once they reach this size, they begin to divide, thereby giving rise to new cells. Practically outside this range, reproduction of unicellular organisms does not occur.

Consequently, on this section of the S-axis, on this hierarchical site, the mystery of reproduction of all living organisms is realized: from unicellular to multicellular.

Moreover, not only the reproduction of previously formed systems, but also the formation of new ones — the transformation of dead matter into living matter — takes place in this size range.

Let us recall that all living things are divided into two main groups: the first group lives at the expense of the physical environment and physical energy, forming the foundation of the pyramid of nutrition; the second group lives exclusively at the expense of the energy of the first group.

The main building block of the first group is plants; among multicellular organisms, only plants can transform the energy of sunlight into biological energy and physical substance. All other living organisms ultimately derive their energy and substance from plants. And only plants use substances from the non-living environment for growth.

So, plants are the source of life on Earth in the sense that they are the ones who perform the sacrament of revitalizing dead matter.

Plants have different sizes, but it is obvious that the whole process of revitalization takes place in the plant cell, the average size of which, as already mentioned, is in the range of SCU.
This fact, however, merely indicates the centrality of a structure such as the cell in the animation of matter.

Since all living things (excluding pre-cellular systems) consist of cells, there seems to be nothing unusual in the conclusion about the role of SCU.

Nature has provided two more clues that allow us to verify the logic of the hypothesis. The point is that the energy of sunlight is converted into biological energy not by the cell itself, but by a special structure, the chloroplast. Initially, this system could be of any size: much smaller than a cell or consist of a set of cell colonies. But even here everything coincides: the factory for processing physical energy into biological energy - intracellular organoids chloroplasts - have a length that just reaches 10 microns (the lower limit of the interval marked by us).
The second clue has to do with bacteria. In addition to plants, there is another type of biological systems that revitalize dead environments - bacteria. But not all of them, only autotrophic ones.

Since bacteria come in two types: heterotrophic and autotrophic, it is curious to see how they differ in their place relative to the range of ICH. Is there a fundamental difference in size between them?

So, it is known that heterotrophic bacteria feed exclusively on organic food, i.e. parasitize living matter, while autotrophic bacteria are capable of primary production of organic matter in the Biosphere. So, practically all heterotrophic bacteria are smaller than 10 µm, and all autotrophic bacteria are larger than 10 µm and are exactly in the range of SCU.

Consequently, bacteria also appear to be capable of the mysterious process of revitalizing a dead environment only within the range of the SCU.

Moreover, although multicellular plants make up more than 90% of the biosphere's matter, nearly half of the oxygen and biomass is produced by unicellular algae, mainly diatoms. The overwhelming majority of these algae have sizes belonging to the range of SCU.

To summarize, we can make a very non-trivial CONCLUSION: ALL SYSTEMS WHICH ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CREATION OF NEW LIFE HAVE SIZES OF THE DIAPASON OF SCU.

Figuratively speaking, LIFE CAN BE BORN IN THE SCU AND ONLY IN THE SCU IN THE UNIVERSE! THIS IS THE ONE POINT ON THE S-axis FROM WHICH THE SPRING OF LIFE FLOWS.

This is where sunlight is transformed into biological energy, where minerals are transformed into proteins, where the mother cell divides into daughter cells, allowing unicellular cells to fill every conceivable and unthinkable ecological niche in nature, and where the two sex cells of multicellular organisms meet to start a new life, a new creature. It is likely that the first living systems to appear on Earth were also of the size of an SCU.

AND MAN DOES NOT PASS THIS RULE. The length of the male sex cell, the sperm, and the size of the nucleus of the female sex cell, the ovum (30-50 microns), correspond strikingly precisely to the SCU. Although the oocyte itself is considerably larger than the center-scale size (its diameter varies within 130-160 µm), the lion's share of its substance is only nutrient material for the first stages of development, nothing more than raw material.
The main developmental processes of the human embryo begin with the meeting of the sperm and the nucleus of the ovum, which takes place on a large-scale "shelf" that is practically perfect, this is truly "the place to be".

Once again, we remind the reader that any coefficients from 1 to 9.9 in front of a ten with a degree are only a one order of magnitude deviation within 61 orders of magnitude, hence, changing the coefficients while maintaining the degree will result in a very small error of 1.5% at the very center of the Universe's Scale Hierarchy!

PHYSICAL ASPECT

First. The SCU is the center of the range of dominant electromagnetic forces:

Second. The SCU is very close to the scale center of the thermal radiation range, which is the universal "accumulator" of all kinetic energy of the Universe:

Third. The SCU is the center of symmetry for the stellar heat generation process:

Fourth. The SCU is the center of symmetry for thermal radiation generated in the process of anthropogenic combustion of matter:

Fifth. The SCU is the supposed center of large-scale symmetry for the gigantic amount of heat released during the explosion of galactic nuclei:

Sixth. A partial, but very important additional example is the fact that the Sun's radiation is maximally stable in time exactly in the range of SCU frequencies.

"The amount of thermal energy emitted per unit of time by the Sun ... is remarkably constant. is remarkably constant "¹. But if one moves the S-axis to the left or right of the SCU, the stability of radiation disappears: "...If one judges the Sun by ultraviolet, X-ray, gamma-ray radiation or by the level of radio emission power.... the Sun is a variable star. The intensity of the Sun's corpuscular radiation... also fluctuates "².

Thus, the isolation of the HAB range in the scale hierarchy for protein and non-protein systems is obvious. But here is a paradox: thermal radiation, according to the generally accepted opinion, brings chaos, disorder, and entropy, while life brings the opposite phenomenon — order, non-entropy. However, both processes are concentrated on a narrow strip of scales exactly at the scale center of the Universe.

What is it? A coincidence? Are there too many "coincidences" for a tiny speck on the S-axis?

So, the point of equilibrium, the lever axis of the scaling scales for the whole Universe is the point of the SCU. After all, it is to this point that the energy of the Universe flows. How interestingly everything turns out to be organized!

First, it is from here, from the point of the IAB, that the fountain of biological life springs forth.

Secondly, it is here that the large-scale flows of energy and information intersect, forming in this place the most intense interference pattern of large-scale interactions (see Fig. 2.48).

In addition, there is also a deep physics in the symmetry of thermodynamic processes in this highlighted position of the SCU.

It makes sense, since it is the HAB that is the node of the standing wave of the second harmonic of large-scale oscillations of the Universe, if we consider it in the four-dimensional model. Moreover, except for the extreme scale boundaries of the Universe, there is no point more important for the scale-harmonic oscillations than the MCV. In fact, at least every even M-harmonic creates special stability conditions at this point on the S-axis.

That is why, from the author's point of view, the system stability increases significantly in the IAB, as evidenced by the increased degree of symmetry of all objects without exception, the sizes of which correspond to this range of scales.

Certainly, in this work only the first step to understanding the role of scale interactions and the role of the center of these interactions, the role of the center of the scale symmetry of the Universe, the SCU, was made.

The author is convinced that further research on this issue will reveal to us an incredible number of remarkable laws of nature, which will reveal to us many hidden secrets of the origin of life, its place and role in all universal processes without exception.

But let's ask ourselves another difficult question: is there any geometric, spatial meaning to the center of the S-axis?

At first glance, this is not a real center of the Universe, because there are an infinite number of such centers in the Universe: wherever there is an object with a size of about 50 microns, there is the center.

The center of a sphere or a cube is another matter. Obviously, it is one and unique. The scale center of the Universe has some unusual meaning.

It is the center of a dimensionless proportional space in which everything is not measured in meters or kilograms,

Unique properties of the scale center of the Universe and relations, it is the center of the hierarchical structure of the Universe, which stretched from the Maximons to the Meta Galactics (Fig. 2.51).

In this mysterious center, alas, it is impossible to put any stele with the inscription: "Here is the center of the universe".

But it can be easily shown (see Fig. 2.51) that the concept of a CENTER in general is a RELATIVE concept and has no meaning whatsoever without first defining the size of the space model.

For example, it is obvious that on the surface of a ball, as well as on a circle, there is no center at all!

Let us consider as an example an object very familiar to any reader — a table. When asked where its center is, most readers will immediately point to the center ... of the table top. But thanks to the legs, the table has volume, so its "true" center is under the table top, halfway to the floor.

Consequently, in the three-dimensional model of the table, the only center is not where most of us would point. If the three-dimensional figure of the table is mentally cut by planes parallel to the table top an infinite number of times, then each section will have a single center, but it will differ in its spatial position from the three-dimensional center (see Fig. 2.52).

It turns out that even in such a simple example with a table, there can be as infinite number of centers as there are mass-staff centers.

Consequently, if we consider a three-dimensional model of an object, we can find a single center in it, but when we go to flat models, we find that the centers become infinitely many.

Fig. 2.51. Examples of searching for the true center in spaces of different dimensions, which show that the only center of any closed space is in the higher dimensional space

Let's go further. Let's imagine that we live in a two-dimensional world, for example, on the surface of our table. Then it will appear that there is only one single center in this world (it will be far from the other "true" center of the three-dimensional table). Since we can draw an infinite number of lines through the tabletop, each of them will have its own center, which will not necessarily coincide with the center of the tabletop. Again we have lost the single center.

Let's draw an important conclusion:

Unique properties of the scale center of the Universe

Fig. 2.52.

А. The search for the true center of the table is meaningless if the dimensionality of the space in which the table is considered is not defined.

B. A three-dimensional table can have infinitely many two-dimensional sections, each with its own single center

THE SINGLE CENTER IS DEFINED ONLY FOR THE PRE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE MODEL WE USE.

By the way, this is why in everyday life we subconsciously use different models of space depending on the situation. For example, when young people are asked to sit in the center of the table, they will not think of climbing to the center of the tabletop or climbing under it — to the three-dimensional center, they understand perfectly well that we are talking about the linear space of the edge of the table, the center of which is in a completely different place.

And if in the Universe we can find countless three-dimensional coordinates of a single scale center, it is only evidence that the scale axis is the fourth spatial dimension. Therefore, in the fourth dimension, the size of 50 microns is unique, and in projections on three-dimensional slices of our world we find it in infinite manifestation.

SO, THE S-CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE (SCU) IS NOT A CENTER IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE, IT IS A CENTER IN FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SPACE OF THE UNIVERSE.

However, in order to prove it sufficiently, it would require a separate book, which is currently being written by the author ³. Here we will only note in the most general way that the space of our world is certainly not three-dimensional, but multidimensional, although our knowledge of it is limited so far to only three dimensions.

All modern science (physics, chemistry, astronomy, etc.) is the science of a three-dimensional slice of the Universe, of a world in which the laws of three-dimensional space mainly work. In the third millennium, mankind will have to make a step towards understanding the four-dimensional structure of the world⁴.

Can we now, on the threshold of these tremendous changes, immediately understand and imagine what it is — the fourth dimension of space?

It should be said that this question was asked at least 120 years ago.

FLATLAND

"...For the first acquaintance with the four-dimensional world we find the method of analogy more suitable. Based on the visual geometric ideas about the dimensionality of geometric figures, we can make a gradual ascent on the scale of dimensions and pass from one-dimensional figures to two-dimensional, from two-dimensional to three-dimensional and, finally, to make a decisive step: to take advantage of the remarkable regularities and pass to the consideration of four-dimensional figures".

All references will be cited from the cited book by E. Abbott with page numbers in brackets E. Abbott's book Flatlandia ⁵, first published in 1880, is a truly epochal event in the science of space.

In a very popular and witty way, the author managed to show how conventional all our ideas about the three-dimensionality of space are. For this purpose, he invented a whole world on the plane, in which creatures were represented by polygons, segments, circles.

These beings lived by their own rules, distinguished each other by the rate of change of brightness when moving relative to each other, and so on. They had families, children, homes, their own two-dimensional science, which logically explained why the world was organized in such a two-dimensional way.

But one day, one of the heroes of this world had an unusual adventure.

"It was the last day of 1999 AD. The sound of the rain had long ago heralded the coming of night. I sat in my wife's company, pondering the events of the past and trying to foresee what the coming year, the coming century, the coming millennium would bring." (С. 83)

It is worth noting the date that E. Abbott chose, for it was still 120 years away at the time of publication of his book.

And at that moment a stranger suddenly appeared in the room. "What was our horror when, right in front of us, we saw... I thought it was a circle. I thought it was a Circle, but the mysterious shape before my eyes was changing its size in a different way from that of Circles or any of the regular shapes I knew.

After some time Abbott reveals the secret of the strange Circle's behavior and it becomes clear that Flatland was visited by a Sphere (see Fig. 2.53), which, passing through the plane of this world, changed the size of its cross-section. Naturally, the flat inhabitants of Flatland could only see the Circle, but its properties were unlikely to them - it could increase in size and decrease in size very quickly, appear "out of nothing" and disappear.

It's "nothing and nowhere" was a third dimension that the flatlanders didn't even know about.

Fig. 2.53. The path of a three-dimensional sphere through the flat world of Flatland. You can see how the circle on the plane first grows, then shrinks and disappears

What follows is a very sharpen intelligent dialog in which The Sphere tries in vain to vol to make it clear to the hero that she's a three-dimension. At first, the conversation is absurd. It is only after much effort that she manages to say something sensible:

Stranger. I come to you from the third dimension. It extends upward and downward.

I. Your ladyship apparently meant to say north and south?

Stranger. Not at all! When I spoke of the third dimension, I meant the direction you can't look into because you don't have eyes on the side.

I. I beg your lordship's pardon, but a quick glance is enough for your grace to see that where my two sides meet I have a great eye.

Stranger. I don't disagree, but in order for you to look into Space, you need to have an eye that is not on the perimeter, but on the side: the place that you would rather be in we would call our inside. We in Tridimentia call it our side.

I. To have an eye in your gut! An eye in your own gut! Your Grace is joking.

Stranger. I am not in the mood for joking. I tell you that I come from Space, or, since you do not understand what Space means, from the Land of Three Dimensions, from where, until a short time ago, I used to gaze upon your Plane, which you call true Space. From this vantage point, I could easily look inside any object that you call three-dimensional (i.e., "bounded on four sides"): your houses, your temples, your chests and safes, even your entrails and stomachs. Everything was open to my sight!

I . ...I must confess, your grace, that I have not understood a word of what you are saying..." (С. 89-91)

After demonstrating its ability to penetrate rooms, closets, and other objects that are closed on the plane but open in volume, the Sphere did not convince the hero that the three-dimensional world was real. It finally had to pull him into three-dimensional space and show him his entire two-dimensional world from above.

What he saw finally opened our hero's eyes. This is the climax for which the book was written:

I. But after taking me to the Land of Three Dimensions, your lordship showed me the insides of my compatriots in the Land of Two Dimensions.

What could be easier than to take my humble servant on a second journey, to the blessed region of the Fourth Dimension, whence I could cast my eyes with his lordship to the Land of Three Dimensions and see all that is hidden within any three-dimensional house, comprehend the mysteries of the three-dimensional earth,

to know the treasures of the mines and mines of the Three Dimensions and the insides of any three-dimensional living creature...

Sphere. But where is this Land of Four Dimensions?

I. I don't know, but my honorable mentor should know.

Sphere. I don't know anything. There is no such country. The very idea that it exists is meaningless." (С. 109)

It turned out that the analogy expanded the consciousness of the two-dimensional hero, and he realized that other N-dimensional worlds were possible. But the Sphere could not imagine it, because its consciousness was only reduced one dimension lower in the course of events.

Undoubtedly, the problem of TRANSITION TO FOUR-DIMENSIONAL VISION is very difficult for our standard three-dimensionally organized consciousness. If we accept the author's version that the fourth dimension is the scale axis, then any movement along the S-axis will change the dimensions of the system.

Then it is clear that all pulsations (contractions - expansions) are purely four-dimensional movements. Our heart is the most four-dimensional organ! Moreover, ball lightnings are also four-dimensional, because they have the ability to appear "from nothing" and disappear "nowhere".

It is equally obvious that all UFO stories are encounters with "traveling" objects in four-dimensional space, for which our world is just one of the parallel worlds.

AND OUR WORLD IS ACTUALLY MORE FOUR-DIMENSIONAL THAN THREE-DIMENSIONAL.

Naturally, the lack of understanding of the laws of structural organization of matter along the fourth dimension is compensated by mysticism and other occult explanations.

In such a new issue as the expansion of consciousness to four dimensions, mankind will certainly have to deal with it for many years to come. In the meantime, we appeal to analogies again and we're looking more at projections of the fourth dimension onto traditional models of our world.

Maurice Escher's painting "Reptiles" illustrates the transition from a two-dimensional world to a three-dimensional world and back

At the same time, the S-AXIS is by no means the only projection. We can talk about the hierarchical structure of the Universe, about the spiritual vector, and about many dimensions that do not fit into the three-dimensional model of the world.

As for the SCU, it is certain that many more unique features of this point on the scale axis of the Universe will be discovered in the future. It is important for us to draw a new conclusion here, in line with the modern paradigm: That the human being, as a representative of the biosphere, is not a random occurrence in the Universe but a highly lawful and central phenomenon on the S-axis.

It is true that in the same center there is room for a great variety of other systems, for this center provides the universal information for all living things on earth.

Therefore, the question arises further, WHY, from the point of view of the considered scale model of the world, HUMAN BEINGS ARE DIFFERENT FROM OTHER LIVING BEINGS?

1. Kazimirovsky E. S. We Live in the Sun's Corona. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. P. 58. ↩

2. Kazimirovsky E. S. We Live in the Sun's Corona. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. P. 59. ↩

3. Sukhonos S. I. The Fourth (Scale) Dimension of the Universe. (Manuscript). ↩

4. Sukhonos S. I. On the Threshold of a Four-Dimensional Civilization // Integral Knowledge. Logos of the Universe. First Issue. Moscow: White Alves, 1999. P. 5–32. ↩

5. Abbott E. Flatland, Burger D. Sphereland. Moscow: Mir, 1976. ↩